Two EU-funded scientists have shared in the 2017 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their work in developing ways of producing detailed images of the molecules that form the building blocks of life.
Professor Jacques Dubochet, University of Lausanne, Switzerland, and Dr Richard Henderson, Cambridge University, UK, were awarded the prize jointly with Dr Joachim Frank, Columbia University, USA. They each take home a share of the SEK 9 million (EUR 945 000) award for their work with cryo-electron microscopy.
Their research allows scientists to freeze living molecules - known as biomolecules - mid-movement to examine their structures through 3D imagery. This has proved crucial for numerous areas of research, for example, enabling scientists to obtain images of the Zika virus and to visualise proteins that cause antibiotic resistance.
Prior to their research, electron microscopes were believed to be suitable only for imaging dead matter, but over 25 years ago, Dr Henderson managed to capture a 3D image of organic matter when he viewed a protein at atomic resolution. His work built on Dr Frank’s, who had made the technology applicable in the 1970s and 1980s when he developed a processing method to transform the 2D images into sharp 3D visualisations.
‘I am proud to see that EU support has helped two of this year's Nobel Prize laurates to move biochemistry into a new era.’
Carlos Moedas, European Commissioner for Research, Science and Innovation
Prof. Dubochet added water to the electron microscopy process, which, when it evaporates in the microscope’s vacuum, causes biomolecules to collapse. Together, these discoveries have not only benefitted scientific research but have optimised the strengths of electron microscopes.
Previously Prof. Dubochet participated in the 3D-EM project to which the EU contributed EUR 10 million to develop new electron microscopy approaches for studying protein complexes and cellular architecture.
Dr Henderson was also a participant in the INSTRUCT project which linked the information obtained by major structural biology methods with state-of-the-art cell biology techniques to provide dynamic pictures of key cellular processes at all levels.
Carlos Moedas, European Commissioner for Research, Science and Innovation, said: ‘I warmly congratulate Jacques Dubochet, Joachim Frank and Richard Henderson on their achievement. I am proud to see that EU support has helped two of this year's Nobel Prize laureates to move biochemistry into a new era, which will ultimately benefit the society and economy.’
Dr Henderson and Dr Frank both previously provided external expertise to the EU’s European Research Council.
If you liked this article, please consider sharing it on social media.
As Earth's magnetic shield fails, so do its satellites. First, our communications satellites in the highest orbits go down. Next, astronauts in low-Earth orbit can no longer phone home. And finally, cosmic rays start to bombard every human on Earth.
A group of chemicals known as bi-metallics could help the pharmaceutical industry become more environmentally friendly by cutting the amount of energy used to produce drugs, according to Professor Eva Hevia from the University of Strathclyde, UK, who says that sustainability is a top priority for chemists.
Every year 7 million hectares of forest are cut down, chipping away at the 485 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) stored in trees around the world, but low-cost drones and new satellite imaging could soon protect these carbon stocks and help developing countries get paid for protecting their trees.
As temperatures rise in the Arctic, permafrost, or frozen ground, is thawing. As it does, greenhouse gases trapped within it are being released into the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide and methane, leading to previously underestimated problems with ocean acidification and potential mercury poisoning.
Detailed biomass maps will enable developing countries to better access climate funds.
Thawing ground sends carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere.
With environmental changes locked in for several decades, are we too late to save the Arctic?