A prosthetic hand no longer needs to be just a piece of nicely moulded plastic – it can be connected and reactive, and even respond to commands directly issued by the brain.
At the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) in Switzerland, Professor Silvestro Micera is pushing the limits of intelligent prosthetics one step further. With his team, he aims to produce a bionic arm that is fully integrated into the patient’s nervous system.
‘Our goal is to restore a bi-directional link with the nervous system, restoring the natural pathways between the brain and the muscles,’ he said. ‘Over recent years, there has been a lot of progress in the domain of artificial hands.’
For centuries, humans have replaced a missing limb with a prosthesis for many reasons: cosmetic, vocational, or for personal autonomy. It is in this last domain that Prof. Micera, Head of the Translational Neural Engineering Laboratory at EPFL, is working.
‘We are developing electrodes to be implanted in the peripheral neural system,’ he said. ‘In this way, you can reconnect the nervous system in a more natural and potentially effective way to the prosthetic hand.’ ‘We are developing electrodes to be implanted in the peripheral neural system. In this way, you can reconnect the nervous system in a more natural and potentially effective way to the prosthetic hand.’ Prof. Silvestro Micera, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
‘We are developing electrodes to be implanted in the peripheral neural system. In this way, you can reconnect the nervous system in a more natural and potentially effective way to the prosthetic hand.’
Prof. Silvestro Micera, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
Improving the quality of life
‘When we grasp an object, multiple signals come down from the brain to the peripheral nerves,’ said Micera, who is also Professor at the Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna in Italy. ‘We can record them, identify the kind of task the patient plans to do, and control the prosthesis. The prosthesis, in turn, is sensorised and we can feed back the sensory information by stimulating the sensory peripheral nerves.’
‘We have already tested the possibility of recreating this loop over a four-week period with a prosthesis,’ he said. ‘After many years of work, and thanks to the support of the European Commission, we are now ready to undertake our next clinical trial.’
The next step in this project will be to make the implantable electrodes suitable for long-term use, not just four weeks, and so they’ll be testing them over a much longer period of time. ‘From several months to a couple of years,’ said the researcher. ‘This will show us whether we have a suitable solution to this problem, or if we need additional developments in terms of processing, technology, controls, etcetera.’
A prosthesis controlled directly by the nervous system could have a huge impact on the life of an amputee, giving them something that comes closer to replicating the fine motor skills employed when manipulating an object with a real hand. ‘Clearly, the quality of life is significantly improved,’ said Micera.
The plan is to launch such a prosthesis within five to six years, at the earliest.
Prof. Micera has been involved in bionic hand projects since 2008. From 2008 to 2011 he was the Head of the Neuroprosthesis Control Group and Adjunct Assistant Professor, Institute for Automation at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ). At that time, he was involved in the MUNDUS (MUltimodal Neuroprosthesis for Daily Upper limb Support) EU-funded project, the aim of which was to develop novel assistive technology by combining robotics and electrical stimulation.
Although today he is at EPFL, he is also a Professor at Scuola Superiore Sant Anna in Pisa, (IT), a partner of the TIME (Transverse Intrafascicular Multichannel Electrode System) EU-funded project. This project aims to develop and use an implantable electrode placed inside the body’s nervous system. It is the combination of these two projects that allowed him to test the fully integrated prosthetic hand mentioned above.
In the solar system’s early days, a first Earth is thought to have been pulverised by a planet that scientists call Theia. We don’t know what it was made of or where it came from, only that it may have been the size of Mars. The powerful collision destroyed both planets so completely that scientists can only guess what they were like.
As a child, you almost certainly at one stage spent hours watching ants move about from their nest. Maybe you dropped a piece of food and watched as a group of ants came and picked it up, carrying it home in an impressive display of cooperation.
Nature provides people with everything from food and water to timber, textiles, medicinal resources and pollination of crops. Now, a new approach aims to measure exactly what a specific ecosystem supplies in order to incentivise decision-makers and businesses to help combat biodiversity loss.
Europe’s position on privacy, regulation and competition could be a key way to attract entrepreneurs who share those values but there is still some work to do in encouraging ambition, according to Nicklas Bergman, a Swedish entrepreneur and technology investor. Over the past two years, he and other entrepreneurs have advised the European Commission on the design of the European Innovation Council (EIC), an initiative to support companies, researchers and entrepreneurs hoping to start their own business or scale up their projects internationally. The second phase of the pilot was launched on 18 March 2019.
To protect species, we need to speak the language of business, say experts.
He has advised the EU on its new European Innovation Council.
Species loss needs urgent international action, says Prof. Georgina Mace.