A decrease in private sector innovation activities means that levels of innovation in the EU did not increase in 2014, according to the EU’s Innovation Union Scoreboard which was published on 7 May.
The Innovation Union Scoreboard is an annual report that ranks EU Member States according to their levels of innovation and assesses the EU’s overall performance in the global market.
It shows that 13 countries have improved their performance since the last assessment but 15 countries are less innovative than in 2013.
Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Germany topped the scoreboard as the EU’s most innovative countries, while Latvia, Bulgaria and Romania remained at the bottom. However, both Latvia and Bulgaria have made significant increases in their performance since 2007, ranking first and second for countries that have improved their innovation the most.
Presenting the results in Brussels on Thursday, Carlos Moedas, EU Commissioner for Research, Innovation and Science, said that the lack of innovation growth in 2014 was due to a decline in private sector innovation activities.
‘What we have seen in the last year is that … unfortunately, things are a little bit stalled,’ he said. ‘The first question is: is it because of the science base, is it because of the resources? No. All that is still improving. Where the problem seems to be coming up is on the private side.’
Areas highlighted by the Commissioner as seeing a particular decline include the availability of venture capital as a percentage of economic output, and the share of small- and medium-sized companies with in-house innovation.
Breaking down barriers
‘In the last seven years the European Union has been closing the gap of innovation when compared to the United States and Japan.’
Carlos Moedas, EU Commissioner for Research, Innovation and Science
In order to create an innovation-friendly environment for businesses, Commissioner Moedas said the EU is working to increase access to finance and lower barriers to innovation in the labour markets, product markets and judicial systems.
‘We need more investments to boost the EU’s innovation performance. This should go hand in hand with better conditions and a single market for innovative products and services in Europe.
‘Today you live in a world where speed and scale are extremely important. To have speed and scale you really have to have the right reforms in Europe so we do not have barriers between countries.’
Globally, South Korea is the top innovation performer but the EU also ranks as less innovative than the US and Japan. Since 2007 this gap has been narrowing, however, as innovation has been growing faster in the EU than in the US and Japan.
‘Indicators are not about absolute numbers, indicators are about trends,’ said Commissioner Moedas. ‘What you see is that in the last seven years the European Union has been closing the gap of innovation when compared to the United States and Japan.’
The Innovation Union Scoreboard is an annual comparison of how EU Member States are performing in terms of research and innovation.
It is based on 25 different indicators, which cover three areas: whether conditions are in place to allow innovation to occur, how much firms are contributing to innovation, and how innovation efforts are translating into benefits for the economy as a whole.
The scoreboard also benchmarks the EU against non-EU countries including Serbia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Turkey, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland. A more limited number of indicators are used to assess innovation in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Japan, Russia, South Africa, South Korea and the US.
A lot of lip service is being paid to making scientific papers free to access but when it comes to action there is a lot of hypocrisy, according to Robert-Jan Smits, the EU's outgoing director-general for research, science and innovation. He has recently been appointed the EU's special envoy on open access, tasked with helping make all publicly funded research in Europe freely available by 2020.
The European Union is scaling up its investment in battery technology with the announcement of a €10 million open competition to design a better battery for electric vehicles and a €50 million cash injection to develop Europe's largest green battery factory.
Digitalisation has a role to play in the conservation and promotion of modern-day cultural heritage but should enhance real-life experiences, rather than replace them, experts say.
There is a need for renewed political attention, says EU’s new special envoy.
Digital cannot replace personal experiences.
Cultural heritage destruction can be a war crime as sites form part of people's emotional landscape, says Dr van Ess.