We could get to the stage where atmospheric greenhouse gases are in decline – a point known as drawdown – and begin to reverse global warming before 2050, but it will require us adopting solutions at an aggressive rate, according to Chad Frischmann, vice-president and research director of Project Drawdown.
Project Drawdown is a worldwide research and communications initiative with a plan to reverse global warming based on 100 existing and emerging solutions. An independent European arm, Drawdown Europe, has now been launched to galvanise the continent into action.
What impact would it have if your 100 solutions to reverse global warming were adopted?
‘These existing technologies, when adopted as a set of solutions, will allow us to sequester greenhouse gases and turn around global warming by 2050 — and this point of reversal is known as drawdown.
‘Drawdown could happen even sooner if we adopt these solutions at a more aggressive rate. We need to envision the future we want. Stabilised or limited global warming is the wrong direction, so we’re communicating these substantive solutions to many different audiences.’
What are the most important solutions out of the 100?
‘There is no silver bullet or top 10, 20, or 50 solutions. We need all of them to be adopted in parallel, and we need to invest in disruptive innovation, as well as efficiency for existing technologies, like next-level solar panels.
‘All the solutions have multiple cascading benefits. For example, regenerative agriculture leads to soil regeneration, better water retention and so on, but also sequesters carbon as an added benefit.’
Is it just a matter of implementation or do new technologies still need to be developed?
‘(In our book) we describe 80 existing solutions that are currently viable, already scaling throughout the world, and have the potential to achieve drawdown when implemented as a system of solutions. We need them all. We also highlight 20 coming attractions - innovative solutions in the pipeline that will help accelerate progress towards drawdown when they come online.’
What do you think are some of the most promising solutions?
‘The impact of the global food system surprised us. What and how much we consume, how much food is wasted, and how food is produced has a dramatic effect on global warming. Of the top 20 solutions, eight are related to food. By comparison, electricity generation has only five, and transportation solutions did not even make the top 20.
‘To reiterate, we need all 80. However, the contribution of decisions we all make every day on the food products we purchase and consume is perhaps the single most important contribution every individual can make.’
Where can people in Europe make a difference?
‘Europe broadly excels in many of these solutions, from adopting more renewable energy, providing more efficient mobility choices, and expanding recycling and composting, to supporting conservation and regenerative agricultural practices. Of course, there is variation within Europe in terms of implementation at national and subnational scales.
‘However, while the region is in many ways at the forefront of climate solutions, Europe, along with the rest of the world, needs to accelerate implementation of these technologies and practices, as well as continue to invest in innovations.’
'We’ve been inundated with the fear-based approach for 25 years, and it hasn’t worked.'
Chad Frischmann, VP and Research Director, Project Drawdown
A European hub, Drawdown Europe (DE) has been set up to encourage this. What is it going to do?
‘We’re working very closely with organisations like Climate-KIC, the German Energy Agency, and the European Climate Foundation, with the idea that DE - our first regional hub - can become a convergence point for the many existing initiatives and climate leadership shown across Europe. Specifically, the hub will bring more research institutes into collaboration on Drawdown’s solutions, creating localised sets of solutions.
‘One big step is creating the drawdown research platform, which we hope to launch in 2020. DE will be one of the main partners co-creating this global-scale platform for sharing knowledge and tools, and we will to be able to present Europe’s localised solutions as an example of what we can achieve with this platform.
‘DE and Climate-KIC will build (educational) curriculums around these solutions, which could then be scaled all over Europe. Here (in Europe), we have the chance to be a thought leader in a region that combines scientific excellence, economic capability, and, in many ways, political will.’
At the moment, the EU is trying to encourage more people to participate in innovative activities. How does your drive for the 100 solutions fit in with this?
‘It’s very much in alignment with these (policies). We’re not here to replace or reinvent but to build off and interlink with the brilliant open innovation platforms and policies that are being developed at this point. The process of open innovation in Europe encourages (our) model.’
Some people believe it’s too late to stop global warming. What’s your response to this?
‘We’re not in the business of spreading fear, confusion, doom and gloom. Instead, we’re approaching this from the perspective of exposing the tangible benefits of technologies and practices so that decision-makers can adopt them.
‘We’ve been inundated with the fear-based approach for 25 years, and it hasn’t worked. We need to change the paradigm to one of possibility and opportunity.’
One of the partners that co-launched Drawdown Europe is the EU’s European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), which works to spur innovation and entrepreneurship across Europe as part of its Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs).
The idea is to form partnerships between universities, research labs and companies to help develop new products and services, start new companies and train new entrepreneurs.
Through its Climate-KIC, which focuses on innovation for climate action, it will contribute to Drawdown Europe by offering expertise, insight and capacity to deploy solutions at scale.
The research in this article was funded by the EU. If you liked this article, please consider sharing it on social media.
More than six months into the coronavirus crisis, data show that not just age, but also biological sex plays a pivotal role in the manifestation and response to Covid-19, with more men dying from acute infections versus women in the short term. This discrepancy has shined a spotlight on a key theme that has gained traction in recent years: is enough being done to account for sex and gender in disease and medicine? Not enough, says Dr Sabine Oertelt-Prigione, the chair of sex and gender-sensitive medicine at Radboud University in the Netherlands and a member of the European Commission’s expert group on gendered innovations.
Eavesdropping on the shudders and groans echoing deep inside alien worlds like Mars and the moon is revealing what lies far beneath their surfaces and could teach us more about how our own planet formed.
The division of the Earth’s surface into seven major mobile plates is fundamental to our planet’s uniqueness, creating a habitable environment and possibly the conditions under which life itself originated. The theory of plate tectonics is 50 years old, but there are many puzzles left to answer, says Dr Kate Rychert, who studies the geology at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean.
Earth is not the only place in our solar system that shakes with seismic activity.
Dr Sabine Oertelt-Prigione on a ‘moment of awakening’ for medical research.
Dr Kate Rychert studies ocean plate structures.