To stand a chance in the war against infectious diseases, European researchers need to make preparations in ‘peacetime’ to give us the best chance of fighting the next epidemic when it comes, according to Professor Yves Lévy, Chief Executive of Inserm, the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research.
Will there be an epidemic in Europe?
‘It is quite certain we will have to face a new epidemic. The question is, when and are we prepared? Antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial resistance in general is also already a real concern. For example, in France more than 12 000 deaths every year are related to antimicrobial resistance. It will be a real problem in the coming years.
‘This is why several countries – UK, France, Germany and now the European Commission – are already very much committed to that. The most recent programme (for dealing with antimicrobial resistance) was launched at the G20 in Berlin to develop a hub for research and development programmes.
‘One other risk is climate change. We see now some infectious diseases coming to Europe which were not there previously, for example Chikungunya or Dengue.’
How should society prepare for these diseases?
‘First of all, recognise they are a threat and that we need to control them. Second, conduct surveillance. Third, (increase) coordination and collaboration between different countries. We have to be more active and more prepared during peacetime just to be more reactive when we have to face these epidemics.
‘These viruses (that may cause a pandemic) are known but we don’t have vaccines, we don’t have diagnostics and we don’t have drugs because research is not active in this field. Look at what happened in the last four or five years with Ebola, the vaccines were in the fridge and stopped in Phase I (early-stage trials). It could be exactly the same for another virus.
‘We are quite sure that we will have to face epidemics, but not only in the South of the world but also in Europe. The question is when, and the question is how prepared are we.’
Professor Yves Lévy, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, France
‘For example, Nipah virus in east Asia and China targets 2 billion people in the world and is a very, very dramatic disease. Today, there is no diagnostic (test) and there is no vaccine.’
How can we ensure this research is done?
‘The question is how to mobilise funding and the commitment of people, policymakers, institutions, NGOs and industry during peacetime and (for them) to say that we have to develop these vaccines.’
People are very aware of the risks, why isn’t this already happening?
‘It’s a question of where you want to put your money. Before the Ebola crisis I am not sure that there was one call to fund research on Ebola at the European Commission. So, if we don’t have the funding, we cannot develop research. With the budget constraints in our countries in Europe, for example, how can you convince people that they have to put money into some disease if you have policymakers who think that we will not have to face this disease?’
What message would you give to policymakers as they are thinking about where to allocate research funds?
‘Increase the budget for research and ensure that this budget is sustainable in the long term, because to develop a vaccine takes 10 years, to find new drugs is 10 years, to develop the pipeline for new drugs for antimicrobial resistance, for example, is a long-term commitment. It can’t just be a programme of three or four years, it should be a long-term commitment because in the end we will have to face this major, major epidemic.
‘Look at what happened with flu. In France with the epidemic of flu in 2014, for example, I think for the first time there was a decrease in life expectancy of people in France just related to the flu epidemic, despite the fact that we had a vaccine. The coverage was low and the vaccine wasn’t particularly efficient. Tomorrow it could be another virus, so research has to develop in a sustainable way.’
Where must this work happen, here in Europe, or in developing countries where diseases such as Dengue and Chikungunya are a real threat?
‘Research should be in the North and in the South, in collaboration. For example, the EDCTP (European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership) programme is in collaboration with the countries of the South. For HIV we have the long history and experience of developing research in the North but in collaboration with the South. For Nipah we should have, and we have, collaboration with China.’
What is the real chance of there being a pandemic? How worried should we be?
‘I cannot quantify the risk, but this means that we need to develop tools to model this risk. For example, we need to have collaboration between researchers conducting climate change surveillance and also the epidemiology of the vectors (disease carrying insects). This is exactly what happens with climate change and hurricanes today, people are looking at the temperature of the sea and they can tell you that the intensity of these climate disorders will increase.
‘But what I am quite sure of is that a new flu infection or epidemic could be a disaster in Europe. Even if we may sometimes predict which kind of virus it will be and prepare a new vaccine, we know today that the coverage of the vaccine or the efficiency of the vaccine is not optimal. We would have a high number of deaths. So, we are quite sure that we will have to face epidemics, but not only in the South of the world but also in Europe. The question is when, and the question is how prepared are we.’
Is there anything you would like to add?
‘If we take into account all the threats we will have to face in Europe – ageing, chronic disease, cancer – this has an impact on the way our societies are developing. It is very important that research funding is maintained, but also I would like to see more involvement and collaboration between the different institutions in Europe when defining the programmes and funding decisions for FP9 (Framework Programme 9, the next EU research funding programme starting in 2021), for example.
‘The countries and the Member States are involved, but perhaps we need more brainstorming and not to decide in a bureaucratic way how to develop these programmes.’
Do you mean organisations such as Inserm should be more involved in this process?
‘France is represented, but not the institutions and the researchers. Inserm represents researchers, I represent also the primary biomedical research institution in Europe, but I haven’t had any official contact. I think it would be good to have a way to involve the researchers directly and the institutions.
If you liked this article, please consider sharing it on social media.
In 2013, the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, the European Commission and other funders set up GloPID-R, a global alliance aimed at getting different funders to talk to each other and coordinate the research that they fund.
The idea is to organise funders' efforts and come up with an effective response within 48 hours of an outbreak or re-emergence of an infectious disease with pandemic potential.
As the first coronavirus vaccines started to be rolled out at the end of a tumultuous 2020, UK officials unexpectedly endorsed stretching the gap between the first and second vaccine dose by up to three months – an approach also considered by other countries.
Artificial intelligence (AI) used by governments and the corporate sector to detect and extinguish online extreme speech often misses important cultural nuance, but bringing in independent factcheckers as intermediaries could help step up the fight against online vitriol, according to Sahana Udupa, professor of media anthropology at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany.
There are about 1,500 potentially active volcanoes worldwide and about 50 eruptions occur each year. But it’s still difficult to predict when and how these eruptions will happen or how they’ll unfold. Now, new insight into the physical processes inside volcanoes are giving scientists a better understanding of their behaviour, which could help protect the 1 billion people who live close to volcanoes.
Pragmatic or dangerous – what do the experts say?
Better predictions of volcano behaviour could protect people and infrastructure.
Dr Kate Rychert studies ocean plate structures.