When cows burp, they release bursts of gas that are full of methane, a greenhouse gas that traps heat from the sun more than 20 times as efficiently as carbon dioxide. Now scientists are working out how to reduce the environmental footprint of these belching bovines.
It's a major issue because cattle farming is on the rise due to an increasing global population and the emergence of middle class societies in Asia and Africa.
‘People think of carbon dioxide as the main greenhouse gas, but methane is pretty important too,’ said Professor John Wallace from the University of Aberdeen, UK. ‘From all the greenhouse gas emissions produced by man, 16 % of this is methane while around a third of that comes from ruminant livestock.’
Ruminants are animals, such as cows, which have multi-chamber stomachs that rely on bacteria to break down plant-based food. In this digestive process, a fully grown cow can release up to 500 litres of methane into the atmosphere each day.
Although not all cows produce methane at the same rate, the 1.4 billion cows on the planet means the gassy emissions soon add up. In fact when the entire supply chain is taken into consideration, livestock accounts for 14.5 % of total greenhouse gas emissions.
Prof. Wallace coordinates RuminOmics, an EU-funded project which is aiming to decrease the environmental footprint of ruminant animal production by understanding why different cows produce the amount of methane they do.
The researchers are looking at how the cows’ gastrointestinal microbial ecosystems – known as gut microbiomes – are controlled by the host animal and its diet, and how this impacts on greenhouse gas emissions.
‘When certain bacteria are present in the rumen, the cattle produce less methane,’ said Prof. Wallace. ‘We want to enrich this bacteria so we are looking for the precise genetic profile of animals that have it in high numbers.’
If lower methane production is a genetic trait, then it would be possible to selectively breed climate-friendly cows.
‘One of the aims of RuminOmics is to identify animals and compare their genetics to figure out what are the traits that lead to this lower production. Animal breeders will then be able to select those traits and provide animals that have a lower environmental impact,’ said Prof. Wallace. ‘From all the greenhouse gas emissions produced by man, 16 % of this is methane while around a third of that comes from ruminant livestock.’ Prof. John Wallace, University of Aberdeen, UK
‘From all the greenhouse gas emissions produced by man, 16 % of this is methane while around a third of that comes from ruminant livestock.’
Prof. John Wallace, University of Aberdeen, UK
Changing what they eat can also lead to climate-friendly cattle. A diet rich in maize, barley or even garlic can reduce methane levels in cows, while dietary supplements have been shown to have a substantial impact too.
‘We are investigating calcium nitrate in the diet,’ said Prof Wallace. ‘The mechanism for methane formation involves hydrogen; the first stage is that bacteria produce hydrogen which is turned into methane. The (calcium) nitrate can intercept some of that hydrogen, meaning less methane is formed.’
Another way of reducing emissions from livestock is to offset them by chosing pasture crops that absorb greenhouse gases and lock them into the soil.
One way to do this is to plant more legumes, such as clovers, in the soil, according to the EU-funded ANIMALCHANGE project, which has been analysing farm activities to find out how to reduce emissions from livestock including cattle, pigs and poultry, and how to adapt the sector to climate change.
‘When you have soils that have been degraded, you can build up the organic matter contained through growing diverse species of legumes which enhances the soil carbon content,’ said the project cordinator, Dr Jean-François Soussana from the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) in Paris, France.
‘In this way, you will significantly offset methane emissions from cattle.'
If everybody in the EU became a 'demitarian' by halving the amount of meat and dairy they eat, it would reduce nitrogen and greenhouse gases from agriculture by between 25 % and 40 %. These are among the findings of the Nitrogen on the Table report prepared for the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, which published its key messages last year. The full report is now complete, and will be launched in Brussels in November 2015.
It says that on average, people in the EU eat around 70 % more protein than is required under World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations, and that halving meat and dairy consumption would not only reduce emissions but also make us healthier by limiting our intake of saturated fats.
Co-author Professor Mark Sutton, who coordinates the EU-funded ECLAIRE project looking at the effect of climate change on air pollution, said there is huge power for pollution control in simply reducing our meat and dairy consumption. 'Adopting a demitarian diet across Europe would reduce nitrogen pollution levels by about 40 %, and complement the low-emission farming practices currently being discussed in revising the National Emissions Ceilings Directive,' he said.
For more information visit: www.eclaire-fp7.eu/
From the possible demise of Merlot grapes in Bordeaux to loss of olive trees in north Africa, the impacts of climate change will be felt by farmers across the Mediterranean region, say climatologists.
Fears over supermarket shortages during the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic led many people to buy their food from local producers, raising the prospect of a transformation in the way people get their food in the future. But while eating locally and shorter supply chains are often viewed as a more sustainable alternative to our global food system, the reality is much more complicated, explains Dr Tessa Avermaete, a bioeconomist at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven in Belgium.
Medical suppliers must change how they manage their supply chains, and factories need to be able to rapidly pivot to manufacturing different products, in order to respond quickly to the next major crisis and avoid shortages of vital medical goods, experts say.
Two anti-inflammatory drugs – tocilizumab and sarilumab – as well as steroids, have been identified as potential life-saving coronavirus treatments thanks to a trial set up in the wake of the 2009 swine flu pandemic that mirrors the way that people receive multiple treatments while in intensive care.
Producers must act now to ensure survival, say experts.
In-depth knowledge of supply chains and pre-certification scheme could reduce medical supply disruption.
Dr Kate Rychert studies ocean plate structures.